Thanks for the tip. Off to find out the scoop right now...
Seriously. When it's been this long before we see them, I can only draw one conclusion: ugly-ass baby.I mean Christina Aguleria and her hairy husband? That is one another kid that I just don't being attractive in any way, shape or form.
Seriously! I want to see her baby and Christina Aguilera's!
No kidding! And they'd better be pretty damn snappy about getting out the pix of J-Lo's twins once she squeezes them out. Patience may be a virtue, but it ain't mine.
Maybe they want to top Suri.
I wonder if they're holding out for more money. Or if they want to be infamous for it like Tom & Katie. They shouldn't do that though - they don't want the inevitable conversations that would arise from that comparison - "Suri was so much friggin' cuter." I mean, when I saw Suri on that cover I tried to return my kids to the local Walmart. I love the name Harlow. So cute.
My theory is they're waiting for her to get rid of the new baby uglies. You know, splotchy skin, flakey hairline, wrinkly hands. They're waiting for her to get pretty, and also that will bring in more money. I'm dying to see this baby though. Oh, and have you seen how HUGE JK Lo is?? I love it!
Have you heard the conspiracy theory that the reason TomKat held off on showing Baby Suri is that she was born in January not April...and it's much easier to pull off the date switcheroo with an older baby?Also, there's a conspiracy theory that Katie did not run the entire NYC Marathon?Not that I read Perez Hilton or anything...
Good questions. You know they say the ugliest people make the cutest babies though. Take my kids, they are the most ADORABLE GORGEOUS babies. My husband and I...not so much.
I mean really! Show us the kid already!
Post a Comment